RESOLVING CONTRADICTIONS (AL-TA’ĀRUḌ WA AL-TARJĪH) BETWEEN SCRIPTURAL EVIDENCES: AN ANALYSIS OF THE JURISPRUDENTIAL PRINCIPLES

Abstract

The selective manipulation of scriptural evidence by individuals with malicious intentions has become a widespread issue, fueling extremism, terrorism, and violence globally. This perhaps is as a result of contradictions which often stems from human interpretation rather than the provisions themselves. Through a doctrinal methodology, this article examine the established jurisprudential principles on contradictions of texts and ways of resolving them (Al-Ta’āruḍ Wa Al-Tarjīh) to safeguard the integrity of these provisions. The article found among others that robust principles have been developed by the jurists to resolve any such contradictions. Ultimately, the article concludes by pointing and emphasizing the importance for a deeper understanding of Islamic jurisprudence and its methodologies thereby underscoring the need for a context-sensitive approach to interpreting scriptural evidences. To prevent the misinterpretation and misuse of these text in the teaching and development of Islamic law therefore, the article recommends that only qualified individuals should be allowed to interpret Islamic law through the force of authority. Also, stakeholders, including Islamic scholars, educational institutions, Muslim communities, researchers, and governments, should collectively promote, develop, and apply al-ta’āruḍ wa al-tarjīḥ principles to enhance understanding, resolve contradictions, and inform policy-making in Islamic contexts.